Including Explicitly the Question of ‘Which' in Evaluation Studies
نویسندگان
چکیده
Existing studies of user acceptance factors try to provide answers to the questions of ‘why’, ‘what’, ‘who’, ‘when’ and ‘how’. In this paper, we propose to include the explicit question of ‘which’ into future evaluation studies. Two distinct approaches are discussed to address the question of ‘which’. The aim is not to show which is the best, but rather to demonstrate the potential of some alternative approaches to addressing ‘which’.
منابع مشابه
Evidence-Based Evaluation of Physiological Effects of Standing and Walking in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is damage to spinal cord, which is categorized according to the extent of functional loss, sensation loss and inability of the subjects to stand and walk. The patients use two transportation systems including orthosis and wheelchair. It was claimed that standing and walking bring some benefits such as decreasing bone osteoporosis, prevention of pressure sores, and impro...
متن کاملQuantitative evaluation of software security: an approach based on UML/SecAM and evidence theory
Quantitative and model-based prediction of security in the architecture design stage facilitates early detection of design faults hence reducing modification costs in subsequent stages of software life cycle. However, an important question arises with respect to the accuracy of input parameters. In practice, security parameters can rarely be estimated accurately due to the lack of sufficient kn...
متن کاملPrediction and evaluation of runoff data in south of Qazvin watershed, using a fuzzy logic technique
The important criteria for designing in the most of hydrologic and hydraulic construction projects are based on runoff or peak-flow of water. Mostly, this measure and criterion is calculated or estimated by stochastic data. Another feature of these data that are used in watershed hydrological studies is their impreciseness. Therefore, in this study, in order to deal with uncertainty and impreci...
متن کاملSurveying the Spatial Justice and planning theories with emphasis on Iran’s conditions
Segregation has been widely discussed by social scientists and especially by urban geographers and planners over the past decades. However, regardless of their focus, most of these studies view segregation as an obvious case of spatial injustice. I argue that this implicit relationship between segregation, (in) justice, and space needs to be reexamined. This paper approaches this task by review...
متن کاملCorrelation of Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) with other Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)
Background: The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a simple, one-question patient-reported outcomemeasure (PROM). We systematically reviewed correlations between SANE and more extensive PROMs.Methods: We identified studies with correlation coefficients between SANE and other shoulder, knee, and anklespecificPROMs. We calculated mean, median and range across studies...
متن کامل